Skip to content

Elephant mortality in Kenya – Understanding the threats and solutions

Kenya is one of Africa’s most important elephant strongholds, with the Tsavo Conservation Area, Amboseli, Laikipia, and Samburu supporting tens of thousands of elephants. Decades of dedicated conservation work have reversed the worst of the poaching crisis, stabilizing populations that once faced collapse. Yet today, elephants confront new and equally serious challenges.

Mortality is no longer dominated by ivory poaching alone. Increasingly, climate change, drought, and human-elephant conflict (HEC) are driving deaths. To secure Kenya’s elephants for future generations, it is essential to understand what kills them, which individuals are most at risk, and how conservationists can respond with science-driven solutions.

Types of elephant mortality in Kenya

Natural Causes

Roughly one-third of elephant deaths in Kenya are from natural causes. These include old age, disease, and calf predation by lions or hyenas. However, the single biggest natural driver is drought. Prolonged dry spells lead to mass starvation events, especially when food and water become critically scarce. The 2009 drought, for example, killed thousands of elephants across Kenya, with carcasses scattered across dried riverbeds. Natural mortality is a reminder that elephants are finely tuned to their environment—and when climate stress intensifies, their survival becomes precarious.

20250908 Elephant Carcass Voi Airstrip 37m 0456564 9629353 Kj
This elephant died of natural causes near Voi Airstrip.

Poaching

Poaching shaped Kenya’s elephant story for much of the 20th century. During the 1970s and 1980s, industrial-scale ivory poaching drove catastrophic population declines, and again between 2010 and 2013 during the global ivory crisis. Poachers used rifles for efficiency, but also spears, poisoned arrows, and even cyanide or pesticides to contaminate waterholes.

Today, poaching has been sharply reduced thanks to anti-poaching patrols, aerial surveillance, intelligence networks, and international ivory trade bans. However, large-tusked bulls—Super Tuskers—remain targets, and even small spikes in poaching can erase decades of progress.

Human-Elephant Conflict (HEC)

20250819 1006 Arrow Removed 37m 0481125 9626112 T2 Cm
Tsavo Trust recently removed this arrow head from an injured bull elephant within the Tsavo Conservation Area.

Now the greatest cause of elephant mortality in Kenya,HEC arises when elephants raid farms, trample crops, or compete with livestock for water. Farmers often respond with spears, poisoned arrows, or firearms. While less commercial than poaching, HEC is more insidious because it stems from everyday survival struggles between people and elephants. Conflict-related deaths have climbed steadily over the last decade, particularly in Tsavo, Laikipia, and Narok—regions where elephants’ ranges overlap heavily with human settlement.

Other Causes

Smaller mortality categories include accidents—train collisions in Tsavo are a recurring issue—vehicle strikes, and occasional euthanasia of severely injured elephants. Though less common, these causes highlight the risks elephants face in increasingly human-dominated landscapes.

Trends in mortality

Data from 1992 to 2017 show a clear evolution of threats:

  • Poaching peaked in 2012, claiming thousands of elephants across Kenya.

  • Natural mortality surged in drought years such as 2009 and 2013–2017, when starvation deaths were widespread.

  • Conflict mortality spiked in 2009 and again in 2017, with steady increases since.

Over the last five years, poaching has dropped to historic lows, while HEC has overtaken it as the leading cause of death. This shift underscores the success of anti-poaching efforts—but also the urgent need for conflict mitigation strategies as drought, habitat loss, and human population pressures intensify.

Who gets killed?

  • Matriarchs and adult females: Frequently killed in conflict incidents when defending calves or crops. Their loss is especially damaging—matriarchs carry decades of memory about waterholes, migration corridors, and survival strategies, and without them, herds lose cohesion.

  • Calves and juveniles: Particularly vulnerable during droughts when they cannot keep pace with migrating herds or access adequate forage. Also susceptible to predation when separated.

  • Mature bulls: Still targeted for ivory in poaching incidents, but also frequently killed in crop-raiding incidents. Bulls are often bold foragers, placing them at the frontline of human-elephant conflict.

  • Super Tuskers: With ivory scraping the ground, these rare bulls are irreplaceable both genetically and symbolically. Their loss removes conservation icons and critical breeding stock.

Environmental correlations

Elephant mortality is tightly bound to environmental and human factors:

  • Drought is the single most consistent driver. Dry years push elephants into farmlands and settlements, creating flashpoints for conflict.

  • Temperature rise lengthens drought cycles, drying rivers and waterholes faster.

  • Rainfall patterns create boom-and-bust cycles: in wet years elephant births surge, but subsequent droughts can lead to mass die-offs.

  • Human population density correlates with higher HEC mortality, especially in counties like Taita Taveta and Laikipia.

  • Livestock density drives competition for forage and water, often triggering direct conflict incidents.

Impacts on elephant populations

Elephant deaths are not all equal—losing certain individuals reshapes the population:

  • Matriarch deaths cause cascading effects: calves lose survival guidance, migration knowledge is erased, and orphan survival drops sharply.

  • Older bulls are prime genetic contributors; their loss diminishes genetic diversity and reduces the likelihood of producing strong tuskers.

  • Adults overall form the reproductive backbone of the population. High adult mortality slows recovery and threatens long-term viability.

  • Social disruption follows conflict-related mortality, with orphaned young males often becoming aggressive and more prone to raiding farms, fueling further conflict.

Recommendations for elephant conservation in Kenya

Combatting Human-Elephant Conflict

  • Community partnerships: Compensation and insurance schemes reduce retaliatory killings.

  • Land use planning: Protecting corridors and buffer zones minimizes overlap between farms and elephant routes.

  • Non-lethal deterrents: Beehive fences, elephant-proof fences, and noise deterrents have proven successful in various communities.

  • Rapid response teams: Quick interventions prevent escalations that often lead to elephant deaths.

Climate and Habitat Resilience

20210108 Mbololo B Sand Dam
Mbololo Sand Dam aims to reduce water insecurity for Tsavo’s wildlife.

Monitoring and Research

  • Mortality monitoring: Real-time reporting via GPS collars and aerial patrols ensures early detection of mortality hotspots.

  • Data-driven protection: Identifying which age/sex groups are most at risk helps prioritize matriarchs and tuskers.

  • Community-led research: Local rangers and citizen scientists play a critical role in tracking conflict incidents and ecological change.

Kenya’s elephant mortality profile has shifted dramatically. Once defined by the ivory trade, today the greatest threat is human-elephant conflict, driven by climate stress and shrinking habitat. Losing matriarchs and tuskers not only reduces numbers—it destabilizes elephant societies and erodes the resilience of future generations.

Yet solutions exist. By strengthening community partnerships, restoring habitats, and protecting critical individuals, Kenya can continue its success story in elephant conservation. Tsavo Trust and its partners remain at the forefront of this effort, ensuring that elephants—symbols of strength, memory, and resilience—endure in Kenya’s landscapes for generations to come.

Back To Top